Hello Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 10:02, Kenny Moens a écrit : > In the region where I live (Hulshout), some of the borders are recently > mapped, but they don't follow the exact features which form the border. > For example, in the area between Ramsel and Westmeerbeek the city border > follows the "Steenkensbeek" which I recently mapped based on Bing data, > if I look at the border itself it has much less points and more-or-less > follows the stream, but not exactly as it should be. > > How is the best way to correct this? > > * Splitting the border and adding the tags/relations of the border > to the stream. Which would mean the line of the stream would both > represent the border and the stream itself. > * Glueing all points of the border towards the stream, so that they > form a single line (but are effectively still two separate lines). > * Or something else.
There has been discussions about this on the talk list. From what I understood, I'd say: - If the border is legally bound to the stream, and should move with it in case its path change, then you should tag it on the same way (or share the nodes). - If it is actually on the same path than the stream, but must stay where it is in case the stream path change, then draw a separate way, approximately over the stream, but not sharing nodes. -- Renaud Michel _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
