On 01/12/2008 16:13, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote: > Brian Quinion wrote: >> Probably it would be possible to filter it so not too many requests >> went to any one site, but that still leaves the possibility that they >> used royal mails postcode finder (or similar) to find their original >> data. Across a large number of sites you could end up doing a >> database extraction from royal mail regardless.
So are those (also) infringing by making the PAF available in bulk online? >> Address books and company mailing lists seemed like a preferable >> source and as long as individuals names are not included privacy >> shouldn't be an issue. >> > I'd noted that too. Business directory listings (Yell, Thomson etc) or house > price finders which are using copyright Land Registry data in the > background. Is Google infringing by sucking all this data into their database? David _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
