Andy Allan wrote: > Ooh, a golden opportunity to point out (to Richard of all people :-) ) > that the key / value pairs are just arbitrary UTF8 strings and can > mean whatever we want them to mean. So the letters n-e-t-w-o-r-k > could mean "importance classification" and n-c-n could mean > "cycling route of national importance" and we can all go home > happy.
So now I can point out to you that "arbitrary importance scales are generally considered harmful in OSM" and we can have that argument too. It just gets better. ;) Your map, your call. Personally I'd be very saddened to see the National Byway rendered in the same way as the National Cycle Network as I think it'd (a) look shit (b) not be helpful to users. But it's not my map. cheers Richard _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
