On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:00:20 +0000 Jonathan <bigfatfro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can someone clarify the situation for me. I'm in Worcestershire > where permission was previously sought to use the Worcs CC PRoW. > However, what is the advice in a situation where you can't use > official PRoW data, Bing shows a path across a field, a ground survey > also shows a clear path across the field but the signs show a Public > Footpath along the edge into another field and rejoining on the other > side. > > Do we map where people are trespassing, maybe with a bland > highway=path tag and source=bing;survey or just map the official > PRoW. Further more, if there are no clear signs somewhere (often the > case), do we just leave it blank, even though the CC show it on their > copyright map or again show a highway=path marking the tresspassing. Map what you know, leave whatever remains for other people or a later date. If you know they are trespassing then it's highway=path, access=private, otherwise just add highway=path as it could be either permissive or private. If you are unable to follow a PRoW on the ground then please consider submitting a fault report to the council. Not only will you be helping fellow mappers who follow in your footsteps but other path users too. -- Regards, Andy Street _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb