On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
> On 23/05/15 16:36, David Earl wrote: > > As I said, I think the upward compatible change for this is to use a tag > > with the unique ID of whatever operator .... > > While not popular, the addition of identifiers IS now gaining traction, > especially where the underlying data relates to imports from other > places. +1 I am in the camp that strongly supports retaining primary key references on the OSM side. It works great, and the occasional problem (for example manual edits deleting the ref) appear to be exactly that: occasional.
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
