Hi Philip, Do you have a specific example where the not:names are not working? The left hand column on http://product.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/area?name=Cambridge has a list of the streets where the not name has been used, so that the Ordnance Survey can use that information as part of the feedback loop, and to allow later review.
I’ve looked at a few examples in the roads missing list, and for the road http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4076126 the comment on the last changeset suggests that there should be a not:name added to the street. I’ve not seen an example where there is a not:name which is not interpreted, and would be interested in any such examples. The daily updates are from the OSM data, so within 1 or 2 days any changes that you make to OSM should show up in OSM Analysis. The updates to the OS data are done manually, which I’ve just done for the November 2015 data, and should be picked up in the next update. This will mean there will likely be a little jump in the numbers of unnamed roads. (Sorry for the delay in updating, I’ve been on paternity leave this past couple of weeks.) Shaun Developer ITO World > On 11 Dec 2015, at 20:36, Phillip Barnett <phillip.p.barn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm slightly confused - I fixed a lot /most of Cambridge with not:name a year > or two ago but on looking again, find the same errors still there. How do I > get ITO to refresh this? The site says it was refreshed today. > > On 11 Dec 2015, at 17:44, Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com > <mailto:jez.nichol...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> Thank you. You've prompted me to renew my quest for 100% in City of Brighton >> and Hove.... as long as the roads with/without apostrophes aren't counted in >> the percentage. >> >> - Jez >> >> On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 at 23:09 Steve Doerr <doerr.step...@gmail.com >> <mailto:doerr.step...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> I think the URL may have changed. Try >> http://product.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main >> <http://product.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main> >> >> Steve >> >> >> On 10/12/2015 22:34, Robert Neil wrote: >>> ITOWorld OSM / OS Locator missing street analysis has been off for a couple >>> of weeks with page not found. >>> >>> >>> >>> Anyone know what is happening with it? >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> Robert >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-GB mailing list >>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb> >> >> >> <https://www.avast.com/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> >> This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. >> www.avast.com >> <https://www.avast.com/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>_______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
