Sorry, my bad. I wasn't fully understanding the layout and was assuming the 
left hand column would disappear. Now I get it.

> On 11 Dec 2015, at 22:17, Shaun McDonald <sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi Philip,
> 
> Do you have a specific example where the not:names are not working? The left 
> hand column on 
> http://product.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/area?name=Cambridge has 
> a list of the streets where the not name has been used, so that the Ordnance 
> Survey can use that information as part of the feedback loop, and to allow 
> later review.
> 
> I’ve looked at a few examples in the roads missing list, and for the road 
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4076126 the comment on the last changeset 
> suggests that there should be a not:name added to the street. I’ve not seen 
> an example where there is a not:name which is not interpreted, and would be 
> interested in any such examples.
> 
> The daily updates are from the OSM data, so within 1 or 2 days any changes 
> that you make to OSM should show up in OSM Analysis. The updates to the OS 
> data are done manually, which I’ve just done for the November 2015 data, and 
> should be picked up in the next update. This will mean there will likely be a 
> little jump in the numbers of unnamed roads. (Sorry for the delay in 
> updating, I’ve been on paternity leave this past couple of weeks.)
> 
> Shaun
> Developer
> ITO World
> 
>> On 11 Dec 2015, at 20:36, Phillip Barnett <phillip.p.barn...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm slightly confused - I fixed a lot /most of Cambridge with not:name a 
>> year or two ago but on looking again, find the same errors still there. How 
>> do I get ITO to refresh this? The site says it was refreshed today.
>> 
>>> On 11 Dec 2015, at 17:44, Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thank you. You've prompted me to renew my quest for 100% in City of 
>>> Brighton and Hove.... as long as the roads with/without apostrophes aren't 
>>> counted in the percentage.
>>> 
>>> - Jez
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 at 23:09 Steve Doerr <doerr.step...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I think the URL may have changed. Try 
>>>> http://product.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main
>>>> 
>>>> Steve
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/12/2015 22:34, Robert Neil wrote:
>>>>> ITOWorld OSM / OS Locator missing street analysis has been off for a 
>>>>> couple of weeks with page not found.
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Anyone know what is happening with it?
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Robert
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-GB mailing list
>>>>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>>> 
>>>>    This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. 
>>>> www.avast.com
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-GB mailing list
>>>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-GB mailing list
>>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> 
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to