Okay, To summarise the discussion so far. Most respondents thought that highway=living_street was not the correct tag for shared use. Nobody explicitly supported this usage. Most seemed to think that there should be a specific tag for shared use to be used in addition to established tags such as access, surface etc. shared_use=yes, traffic_calming=shared_use and highway=shared_use were suggested as tags, with no-one so far objecting to the simple tag shared_use=yes initially suggested by Colin Smale.
Does anyone have any further suggestions or object to the use of shared_use=yes? If it is acceptable I propose to change the roads in Preston back to their prior highway classification (unclassified and tertiary) and add the shared_use=yes tag. Kind regards, Adam On 4 October 2017 at 09:32, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: > Matt Ellery wrote: > > I agree with the idea that living_street isn't appropriate for the > > town centre roads identified here. I did notice that New Road > > in Brighton (mentioned in the shared space Wikipedia article) > > has also been changed to living_street by Pete Owens, although > > he has added access tags as well. > > Frideswide Square in Oxford too. I've not changed it back until we're sure > how we'd tag shared space, but agree it should remain highway=primary > rather > than =living_street. > > Richard > > > > -- > Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
