Many thanks to @Richard Fairhurst, @Warin and @ Paul Berry for their encouragement and help. I will have a go at making the amendments using the iD Editor. I'm not sure how soon that will happen, though, as I hear that Christmas is coming and Grandads like me are meant to spend time with their families, not on the computer. Before I start, I have one more question: @Richard Fairhurst said, "It's more important that the route is unambiguous, i.e. the member ways all join to form a single route without unnecessary branches and loops." However, the Sustrans map shows some dead-end branches (presumably to link into other infrastructure, such as roads and other cyclepaths). There are 2 that are relevant here; one is marked on the ground (probably because it was part of the old route), but the other is not. I do not propose to include the unmarked one, but what about the one that is marked? Should I include it, or not? Regards,Peter
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
