>On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 22:07, ael ><witwa...@disroot.org> wrote: >On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 09:30:00PM >+0100, >Adam Snape wrote: >> >> this point if we're actually advocating the hitherto undocumented usage of >> segregated=yes to mean 'cycleway is separate from main carriageway' because >> I suspect I'm not the only one whose been using it as per the wiki to show >> where bicycles and pedestrians have their own designated lanes within a >> shared use cycleway. We can't use both.
>+1 (separate lanes for cycles & pedestrians) +1 for "segregated" referring to separate (or not) pedestrian and cycle lanes in a shared cycleway Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 09:30:00PM +0100, Adam Snape wrote: > > this point if we're actually advocating the hitherto undocumented usage of > segregated=yes to mean 'cycleway is separate from main carriageway' because > I suspect I'm not the only one whose been using it as per the wiki to show > where bicycles and pedestrians have their own designated lanes within a > shared use cycleway. We can't use both. +1 (separate lanes for cycles & pedestrians) _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
