On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Ian Dees <ian.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think you should imply that there is a "natural=forest" boundary > logically separate from the National Forest's boundary. Assuming you're > using USFS's shapefiles, there should be one thing in there: the boundary of > the national forest. If there are "holes in the forest" anywhere (including > directly on the external border), then they should be inner polygons of a > multipolygon.
There are two separate definitions of what the national forest is. On http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5192654.pdf there's the dark green line ("national forest boundary"), but not everything inside it is light green fill ("national forest land"). Both are in the shapefiles. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
