To expand on the point of having both methods used, starting with the multiple intersection points method, what if all four intersection points were under a relation of a group of intersections, and the number of lanes on each way was marked? That way, routing algorithms could convert from the visually-friendly method to the individual lane and single intersection point method.
Saikrishna Arcot On Mon 14 Oct 2013 05:28:28 PM EDT, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2013/10/14 stevea <stevea...@softworkers.com > <mailto:stevea...@softworkers.com>> > > Hi Martijn: one thing "wrong" I do see at this particular > intersection are extraneous nodes with highway=crossing tags: two > extra ones on the (northerly) east-west ped-path and one extra one > each of the (westerly and easterly) north-south ped-paths. A > fairly minor error in the context of your larger question. > > > > +1, and another thing: the street coming from the right should not be > expanded to a dual carriageway at the point where your colleague has > done it, but rather at the latest possible point (i.e. at the first > insection with the N-S-road) if doing it this way. > > cheers, > Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us