Serge Wroclawski writes: > Propertly boundaries is something that people have wanted, and > we've resisted putting in OSM, despite it being useful for a > variety of people.
For much more practical reasons, mostly that they would blow up the database and introduce a huge number of ways that every editor would immediately add to the JOSM 'hide' list. The scale is completely different. The number of railways tagged as dismantled (or as abandoned which ought to be dismantled) is miniscule in comparison. > I see people who want to know what to do when they encounter a > feature they can't see on the ground. If it's not TIGER data and it has tags, leave it there. Seems like a simple rule to me. If you don't understand why the editor added it, ask them. -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us