No. That's not a mistake. My city uses this as a standard treatment in a number of locations. And as was mentioned earlier this facility type is also common in California.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Spencer Gardner <spencergard...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi all. Has anyone worked out a good tagging scheme for combined >> bike/parking lanes? I'm not sure how common they are elsewhere but there >> are a number of such facilities in my city. >> >> For reference, you can see an example here: >> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=43.06056159&lng=-89.45121 >> 134&z=17&pKey=XByvWxyrk9quLK-noyoB5g&focus=photo&mapStyle=mapbox_streets >> Notice the bike lane sign above the speed limit sign and the cars parked >> on the side. These are also accompanied with pavement markings indicating >> it is a bicycle facility. In effect it's like a regular bike lane next to a >> parking lane, but there's no stripe to separate the two. >> > > I think they just forgot to put the shoulder line down. >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
