Hi, On 06.11.2018 11:53, Vivek Bansal wrote: > 2. I would certainly love smaller more regularly updated extracts! I'm > not sure how much my team would pay for it though.
The downloads are free of charge. Maybe I should check with the Interline folks, I don't want to step on their toes with anything. > 3. I think the most common analysis patterns rely on regions greater > than each county, but smaller than just NorCal and SoCal. The 6 > californias here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Californias > is pretty close to what I would suggest (except i'd have the Bay Area 9 > county region to be one group, perhaps the 7th California?). I don't > know of any spatial files with this breakdown. Creating the split bounds is probably the least difficult part of the puzzle. Reason I'm asking the locals is that I want to create a split that is as useful as possible so thank you for the pointer - is the "six Californias" idea well-known enough that someone in, say, Napa County would immediately know to look for themselves in "North California" and not in "Jefferson" or "Central California"? While I don't *like* overlapping areas, it would be *possible* to have them if it matches what people expect to find. I could do SoCal+NorCal+Bay Area, or the 6 Californias plus Bay Area, or whatever. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us