Aug 31, 2020, 00:17 by frede...@remote.org: > Hi, > > On 8/30/20 22:08, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us wrote: > >> Though I wonder what should be done with viewpoint itself. >> > > In my mind, a viewpoint is not just something from where you have a nice > view; it needs to be signposted or called a viewpoint. This, while > enjoying some "destination" or perhaps even "attraction" status, is not > what I would call a viewpoint. And even a tourist attraction, I think, > should not be something that is illegal to visit. > (1) I think that explicit signpost is not necessary, unusually great view seems sufficient. At least that is how I used this tag. (2) As I understand, this place is described/called viewpoint in multiple sources and widely used as such. So it is fulfilled anyway. (3) In such case I would actually care about legality (I would not always care about it! For example I would happily violate China/ North Korean/Russian laws about legality of mapping). But sadly, it appears to actually to be viewpoint and on the ground survey would almost certainly confirm this.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
