Vào lúc 21:47 2020-09-22, Paul Johnson đã viết:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:56 PM stevea
<stevea...@softworkers.com
<mailto:stevea...@softworkers.com>> wrote:
If you MUST tag place=neighbourhood (note the u) see if you agree
with me that this tag makes most sense in a hierarchy where
place=suburb (and perhaps quarter, if applicable, is/are above) also
exist(s). I'm not strictly saying I believe that
place=neighbourhood CANNOT exist without place=suburb, but it makes
me wrinkle my brow a bit at it not fitting as well as a
landuse=residential (multi)polygon might rather generically and
innocently (without any hierarchy required) fit in.
Landuse=residential fits better for the lots within a place, not as a
substitute for it.
I've never gotten into mapping individual lots, but I agree that
landuse=residential is a reasonable tag to use in conjunction with
place=plot. [1] I don't think that needs to be mutually exclusive of
mapping the surrounding subdivision as a named landuse=residential area.
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dplot
--
m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
