On 04/02/2008, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note: canal measurements are given in feet and inches, as "\d+ft( > \d+in)?". That is, a number, followed by "ft" as an abbreviation, a > space, and then optionally a number and "in".
I can't tell if this is your words or something you've quoted, and I can't find it under the links you've provided. But is anybody suggesting that canals (worldwide) _must_ be measured in feet and inches? The closest we had come to this in the earlier discussions was that many felt that it should be _permissible_ to do so, and even then it was looking like many of the options available were going to be very messy. Dermot _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
