On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Maarten Deen<md...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Having a node shared between a bridge and the way > underneath may solve one problem but introduces another (having to make a > relation to indicate this physical route is not present).
Agreed. > maxheight needs to be applied to the road it applies to. Not the structure > that is going over it. If you want to do that (which is not that uncommon, > water maps do it all the time), introduce another key. Ok. So it seems the question now is, how should maxheight be "applied" to roads passing under bridges? The only reasonable and maintainable approach, in my opinion, is to apply it to the section of road that is physically under the bridge. Any objections? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
