Hi!
Nick Whitelegg schrieb:
>> I would prefer that "designated" does not infer "exclusively
>> designated", so that it's possible to have bicycle=designated as well
>> as foot=designated on a shared pathway (signed with a picture of a
>> person and a picture of a bicycle).
>
> Agree here. UK bridleways for instance should have foot=designated;
> horse=designated; bicycle=designated as all three have equal right. It
> would be a mistake to assume the horse rights are greater than
> foot/bicycle; they are not.
>
> I would similarly guess the shared foot/cycleways in Germany would be
> similar, i.e. foot=designated; bicycle=designated.
Yes, this would work out. And a German bridleway would be
horse=dsignated, foot=no, bicycle=no.
bye
Nop
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
