On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, morb....@beagle.com.au wrote: > Quoting Anthony <o...@inbox.org>: > > Part of me suspects that this whole notion of removing contributions from > > people who don't agree is going to get dropped. At least for the > > contributors who don't respond one way or the other. It's just going to > > destroy too much of the database. > > Wow, this whole issue has kept me up all night, just reading through the > emails and having the implications dawn on me. > > > Have I got this straight? That I *must* agree to this odbl licence, or my > (considerable) amount of edits will get *nuked* from the canonical OSM > database? What a Hobson's choice. > > I'd better go and see what this odbl is then? > > > Brendan
For Australians it means the loss of the coastline, most of which has been re- edited from government data, and major rivers like the Murray Coastline from Australian Geoscience, whose data we obtained, 59736km Murray River 2756km _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
