On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:54 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 2010/1/18 Anthony <o...@inbox.org>: > > That's not how the ODBL works. When the switch is made to the ODBL, > every > > individual changeset/node/way/etc will be effectively in the PD (everyone > in > > the world will have a non-revocable license to do anything restricted by > > copyright law). Only the database as a whole will be under ODBL. > > I don't know enough about ODBL to argue that point, but it seems to be > irrelevent since getting the data out the other end as PD is what is > important to some. > > If this isn't a valid method (waits for some more armchair lawyers to > turn up), then the other option is to have editors upload data to > multiple locations if the desired outcome is to have a set of PD > information. > I didn't say it's invalid so much as it's redundant. All contributions are effectively PD anyway.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
