On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > Why would it be difficult? If a node was created under license X and > > has only been edited by other users allowing license X then it's under > > license X. > > Unless, some share-alike advocates would say, the node was created with > reference to a point Y that was share-alike licensed and thus becomes a > derived work. > > Also, all this is nice & dandy as long as we operate in the "protection > of individual items" space; as soon as we move to the world of database > protection, then all this becomes moot because you would not even be > allowed to extract a group of PD objects from the collection without the > permission of the database owner (unless it is considered insubstantial). > How exactly does one get protection as a database owner? It's unclear to me how OSMF would get protection as a database owner since they're not the ones actually doing anything.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
