An alternative is to use Maperitive and render on the local PC. Its just a matter of using the right rules for rendering but you do need an .OSM file from the web unless you have a local copy.
Cheerio John On 24 June 2010 12:53, Andy Allan <gravityst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah. Also, as Toby says, it's pretty much "totally overloaded", and > has been for the last few months. > > What's happened recently was that the updates broke for a few weeks, > and were restarted last Wednesday. The disk cache then filled up > completely on Friday, so there was only a small window for the tiles > to be re-rendered. Space was freed up on Monday, and then rendering > was stopped again on Wednesday for the next scheduled update. I > estimate it would take about 10-12 days to update all the tiles, and > there simply hasn't been very many days in the last week where the > system has been updating - and because it wasn't updating for three > weeks before that, some tiles are seriously out of date. They should > sort themselves out, over the next week or so. > > As for the new server that's being mentioned, that's being set up at > the moment. New host, new hardware, new software (mainly newer > versions of mapnik and osm2pgsql). Unfortunately it's not as fast as > I'd hoped, and I'm seriously concerned about whether it'll be able to > take the load! Running osm2pgsql in slim mode is soaking up much of > the hardware improvements. We'll see how it goes, but I'm confident > the whole thing is moving in the right direction. > > It starts coming down to questions of time and money, and I only have > a limited supply of both :-) > > Cheers, > Andy > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Shaun McDonald > <sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk> wrote: > > Hi Gregory, > > Your a little out of date of the way that the cycle map is run. It uses > the > > live mapnk rendering, with no upload required. However it is still a > weekly > > update, and can take a week to fully update assuming that the disk > doesn't > > fill up first. > > Shaun > > On 24 Jun 2010, at 16:40, Gregory Williams wrote: > > > > Updates that I’ve made in the past week are now showing on zooms <= 12. > It’s > > not quite there for zooms > 12, but I suspect that that’s simply because > the > > tiles haven’t managed to upload to Andy’s web host yet from the machine > > where he carries out the main rendering. > > > > I do remember seeing Andy tweeting recently that there’d been an issue > with > > updates for a while (during an upgrade IIRC???), so perhaps that may > explain > > it. > > > > I usually notice that changes I’ve made prior to the Wednesday are > reflected > > at all zoom levels by the following Friday. > > > > From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto: > talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On > > Behalf Of Hillsman, Edward > > Sent: 24 June 2010 16:19 > > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > > Subject: [OSM-talk] cycle map not updating? > > > > Has the update frequency changed for OpenCycleMap? Some bike lanes added > in > > late May and early June still haven’t appeared yet. > > > > Ed Hillsman > > Senior Research Associate > > Center for Urban Transportation Research > > University of South Florida > > 4202 Fowler Ave., CUT100 > > Tampa, FL 33620-5375 > > 813-974-2977 (tel) > > 813-974-5168 (fax) > > hills...@cutr.usf.edu > > http://www.cutr.usf.edu > > > > _______________________________________________ > > talk mailing list > > talk@openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > talk mailing list > > talk@openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk