On 18 July 2010 22:19, Simon Ward <si...@bleah.co.uk> wrote: > This also shows that simply asking if contributors will allow their > contributions to come under the ODbL is not enough. I imagine many have
That may be ok, but the CTs go a step further and have future licenses as being fairly open ended, which makes your next point valid: > done both their own surveys, the data from which they might be happy to > relicense, and derivatives of other data (Nearmap, Yahoo!, etc), which > they may not be able to relicense. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
