On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:01 PM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 19 July 2010 03:54, SteveC <st...@asklater.com> wrote: >> John, you're painting a dystopian view based on a couple of key things - >> that 1) nearmap would never change their mind and 2) the 'same thing' could >> happen at any point. > > The email I received from their CEO was fairly definite about the map > data being share alike.
And under ODbL the map data is share alike. >> 1) I think their mind could be changed, maybe by giving them a more positive >> view on the process that led to this license, the people behind it and so >> on. Perhaps they have been given a dystopian view of the license? > > I never said they didn't agree to the ODBL, but that the new CTs, > specifically section 3, wasn't going to be compatible, even if ODBL > is. Only if a later license change were to go non-SA. An hypothetical situation that you have created. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
