On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:40 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just to drag things back on topic, so far most claims seem to be vague > and generalised, however the original proposal about shifting police > and fire into an emergency category doesn't seem to have many/any of > the draw backs of most POIs most people are going to search for most > of the time.
John Smith, your method stinks. You seem to believe that your preferred tag of emergency=fire_station, etc is better. Rather than adding your preferred tags and allowing the community to eventually realize that you are correct, you have _replaced_ many of these tags with your preferred tag. OSMDoc says there were ~25,000 amenity=fire_station last November. http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/amenity/#values You have failed to follow the automated edits code of conduct guidelines on almost every count. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits/Code_of_Conduct Your disdain for clueful change set comments appears to be nothing more than obfuscation. How is the OpenStreetMap community to distinguish these edits from vandalism, and you from a vandal? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
