TimSC I agree he is only talking about how the discussion should be conducted but OSM needs both. If the project definition is unclear then the discussions will also be unclear. The license change is IMHO one of these issues. It is not about wrong or right but about being clear what the intended goals are and why.
2010/8/10 TimSC <mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk> > On 10/08/10 20:40, F. Heinen wrote: > >> >> You can have very valid points and be very right but if the guidelines >> tell that the project is defined "red" and you think "blue" is better then >> when you making this point time after time then you can be defined as >> poisonous (even though you can even be right) as you are draining the >> community. >> > > What are you talking about? The guidelines SteveC proposed are to moderate > how the discussion should be conducted, not how the project is defined! > > TimSC > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
