On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > But changing it is probably a bad idea. Do we really want a relation > with 500 ways representing the street and 50,000 nodes representing > the buildings? >
wow, 500 ways and 50,000 addresses just for one street ! Show me the map ! > After rereading > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories > I'm going to conclude that the proper place to put address information > is in the building data, not in the street data, and that > associatedStreet should therefore be deprecated. > And if you read more on the wiki, you will discover that the Karlsruhe schema is allowing both. Here we speak only about the contributors who selected the solution with a relation. Nobody force you to use it but let others clean-up the relations proposals. Pieren
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
