Thrue, this is a good practice to save often. At the same time we need that
changeset infos be grouped and more informative to help the community better
follow the edits. How to do that?
The first step would be by default for the editors to leave the changeset open
until a new comment is provided or when the mapper ask specifically to close
the changeset. This would avoid one changeset per building as I saw many times.
And yes, we should insist to have comments.
The second step, the editors should prompt for a comment.
And the third step then, it will be to the community to convince the new
mappers to provide more relevant comments.
Pierre
________________________________
De : Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>
À : moltonel 3x Combo <molto...@gmail.com>
Cc : Talk Openstreetmap <talk@openstreetmap.org>; Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu>
Envoyé le : Jeudi 6 mars 2014 6h57
Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] No Changeset Comments from iD
> Am 06/mar/2014 um 12:45 schrieb moltonel 3x Combo <molto...@gmail.com>:
>
> If comparing editors, there's also the fact that iD users tend to save
> much more often than JOSM users, making smaller changesets
last week there was a user on talk-it who lost 2 hours of work with ID because
of a conflict with 1 node ;-)
cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
