sent from a phone
> On 11. Oct 2017, at 16:59, Rory McCann <r...@technomancy.org> wrote: > > No-one's said it yet, but to me, that's a con. Not everyone likes the > share-alike requirement, and that's fine. But there are people, like me, > who think "share-alike" is a pro. I also like the idea of share-alike, but in reality it’s a problem because it prevents use of open data by other open data projects as soon as they don’t use the exact same license. Remember the redaction of OSM data because we changed from one share alike to another? Or the incompatibility of wikipedia and osm? If we import data it’s a pro if there are no strings attached that would potentially force us to remove the data and contributions built upon this data in case of another (not so probable) license change. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
