Hi Tomasz, Could you elaborate on what would be the use-case for this approach and why that is relevant? At the moment I do not see the relevance for mappnig them as an area.
Cheers, dikkenodel ________________________________ Van: Yves <yve...@mailbox.org> Verzonden: Thursday, August 16, 2018 8:20:59 AM Aan: talk@openstreetmap.org Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] Barrier=block areas Being a closed way with area=yes does not mean they aren't connected to the underlying ways: I don't think router be bothered by this. Yves Le 16 août 2018 02:14:49 GMT+02:00, David Fox <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> a écrit : Barriers, by definition, provide some level of restriction. Without attaching them in some form it becomes hard for routers to account for them. Hedges and walls are linear in nature, not an area. On 15 August 2018, at 19:51, Tomasz Wójcik <tom...@wp.pl> wrote: Currently, barrier=block is not allowed to be mapped as an area. As blocks can be big enough to map them as areas, I think it should be allowed, the same as in barrier=wall or barrier=hedge. Anyway, currently we have 3,9k of barrier=block areas in database. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Abarrier%3Dblock Block examples: http://www.concrete-barriers-blocks.co.uk/up/concrete-barrier-type-m-block-photo.gif http://cdn1.codziennypoznan.pl/201606241325/pub/img/full/71/1c58d-a9.jpg Barriers with mapping as area allowed https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=wall https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Abarrier%3Dhedge
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
