Hello, rhabib001. You wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ryc> One thing I don't understand about the log is that if multiple ryc> messages are downloaded, the log doesn't reflect this. Is this a bug? As I understand myself, The Bat can call multiple instances of filtering procedure in a time. For this reason it give to every call a number, usually begins from 1001. By this reason I write into log also this unique number (it is unique in the bounds of current The Bat! session). You can see this numbers in the beginning of every line logged during mailcheck. And there are no such lines for global plugin functions like "getname" or "getversion". Your log has combined the logs of "first" version and last, so there are no such numbers at all at the beginning of the log. >> If any of them includes a spam then the really problem is in your >> regarding base - either you confused spam and non-spam corpuses when >> you create your regarding base, either your regarding base is not >> enough yet. ryc> I have trained the good dictionary on 745 letters, but the spam ryc> dictionary on only 35 letters. Could this be the problem (I have ryc> attached the regard.rdb file). This is the feature of method itself - you can investigate it from mathematically viewpoint - the numbers of spam and non-spam base (counted in letters) ought to be equal. Simple speaking, your base very well "known" what is not-spam, but has a relative hazy idea of what is spam. You need more spam to work, - but this is total problem with this method of filtering! You can, of course, download somewhere a base with spam, but the problem is that in different countries spam is different. Main grain of this method is that all user's regarding bases are different, because their grades includes also "knowledge" of concrete private user mail. So, it is very hard for spammers to cheat many of such filters simultaneously. From the other hand, spam base seems not to be such different from user to user, because spam is a mass mailing. So you can ask a friend to send you many (real) spam and make a better base. Or you can just take some "good" letters and make a new base with relatively equal quantity of spam and non-spam. -- Sincerely, Alexey. Using TB 1.63b7 on WinXP SP1 Corp + MUI RU, spelling by ORFO2002 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBDEV" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
