* Reyk Flöter <reyk.floe...@googlemail.com> [2014-05-15 01:04]:
> > On 15.05.2014, at 00:46, Henning Brauer <lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de> wrote:
> > * Mark Kettenis <mark.kette...@xs4all.nl> [2014-05-15 00:15]:
> >> I don't think this is a good idea; didn't we establish the other day
> >> that "ifconfig <if> eui64" already did what your +inet6 does?
> > almost, it's ifconfig <if> inet6 eui64 - but that isn't all THAT
> > intuitive. I like +inet6 as the opposite of -inet6.
> We don't have "+" something. It is foo or -foo but not +foo. I know that 
> inet6 is already used for the regular addresses, but +inet6 sounds like an 
> inconsistent workaround for a workaround. I don't like it.

just inet6 doesn't work, since that is already used to show all inet6
addrs. 
i find +inet6 very intuitive...

> To "enable IPv6" link-local I would rather prefer two options to put
> either "inet6 eui64" (or an alias like "inet6 link-local") or an actual
> inet6 address in your hostname.if. The latter should automatically
> remove the flag and enable the link-local address - does it work this
> way? 

as said many times, yes it does.

-- 
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services GmbH, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS. Virtual & Dedicated Servers, Root to Fully Managed
Henning Brauer Consulting, http://henningbrauer.com/

Reply via email to