On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 02:15:46PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:30:58PM +0200, Gerhard Roth wrote: > > He's using a model that requires a firmware-blob different from the one > > of all other testers ("run-rt2870" vs. "run-rt3071"). That might explain, > > why he's the only one who got troubles with the new FW. > > Yes, and I just realized that in my previous diff, I accidentally > used the rt2870 image as rt3071 image. > > $ md5 obj/run-rt* > MD5 (obj/run-rt2870) = 0390000127f8c1acf7978a410ffcf563 > MD5 (obj/run-rt3071) = 0390000127f8c1acf7978a410ffcf563 > > Here's a hopefully fixed version.
Works for me on : run0 at uhub1 port 1 "Ralink 11g Adapter" rev 2.00/1.01 addr 3 run0: MAC/BBP RT3070 (rev 0x0201), RF RT2020 (MIMO 1T1R), address 1c:af:f7:11:9c:1b MD5 (/etc/firmware/run-rt3071) = 0e877b1acde54b05bef0bc0ca08478e7 -- Matthieu Herrb