* Martin Pieuchot <mpieuc...@nolizard.org> [2014-08-18 11:03]: > On 15/08/14(Fri) 10:43, Henning Brauer wrote: > > * Stuart Henderson <st...@openbsd.org> [2014-08-15 10:29]: > > > On 2014/08/12 15:46, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > > I find arp(8) output really difficult to read, but more importantly it > > > > does not print the expire time of non permanent entries like ndp(8). > > > > So the diff below change arp(8)'s output to be more similar to ndp(8)'s > > > > one. > > > Personally I like the extra information from the timer, > > same here > > > but not the big change of format (I find the extra whitespace makes > > > it harder to see which MAC address goes with each IP address) > > I actually like the proposed new format there better. > > > or loss of IP addresses where a name exists. > > here I agree with stuart. > Well I couldn't came with a better trade-off. The actual output does > not fit in 80 columns as soon as a FQDN is a bit long and adding the > timer information does not help. So instead of reinventing an output, > I tried to match what ndp does. > At least with this diff the "-n" flag is coherent with what route(8), > netsat(8) and ndp(8) do. > So I hear what you say but I don't see which output can address the > points you raised. > So unless somebody has a better idea, I'd like to commit this so that > we can get use to the new output 8)
fair enough. ok. -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services GmbH, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS. Virtual & Dedicated Servers, Root to Fully Managed Henning Brauer Consulting, http://henningbrauer.com/
