Henning Brauer [hb-openbsdt...@ml.bsws.de] wrote: > now that we have an uncontaminated, err, inet6-free system by default, > IFXF_NOINET6 just doesn't make sense any more. > fully go for no inet6 by default, get rid of the IFXF_NOINET6 guarded > attachments etc. > introduce IFAFATTACH and IFAFDETACH ioctls. note that they are NOT > inet6 specific; the kernel only has code for inet6 so far and will > properly return EAFNOSUPPORT for all others. >
It's time to revisit this one before we are too close to 5.7. IFXF_NOINET6 is backwards.
