I had already responded to the original query with a PMX solution. Maybe
"significant re-coding" is in the eye of the re-coder:

=======================================
1 1 4 4 4 4 0 0
1 1 20 0

t
.\
c24 \loffset{1.5}{\lpar5}\loffset{1.5}{\rpar5}\ c+s<.4 /
=======================================

--Don Simons

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob
> Tennent
> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 7:28 AM
> To: TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org
> Subject: [TeX-music] Re: normalsized cautionary accidentals in musixtex
>
>
>  >|> The commands \cna, \cfl, \csh, etc. in musixtex produce parenthesized
>  >|> *small* accidentals. [...]
>  >|>
>  >|> [EMAIL PROTECTED] \smallna}
>  >|>
>  >|> Where do the parentheses come from?
>  >|
>  >|It seems that this question has not yet been answered; so, just for
>  >|the fun to see how MusiXTeX works ... :-)
>  >|
>  >|The following macros are involved in a \cna call, in the order given:
>  >|
>  >|[EMAIL PROTECTED] \smallna}
>  >|[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Na  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ur [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
>  >|[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]@xl }
>  >|[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@sa\kern\accshift}}
>  >|[EMAIL PROTECTED]@vii=\maxdimen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
>  >|  \else [EMAIL PROTECTED] \fi [EMAIL PROTECTED]@}
>  >|[EMAIL PROTECTED]@iv}
>  >|
>  >|That is: \cna sets [EMAIL PROTECTED] to \maxdimen. This is used just as a 
> switch
>  >|that is later queried by [EMAIL PROTECTED]; if the switch is set, [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED] is called
>  >|which in turn typesets character number [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the music 
> symbol
>  >|font. [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been set to 5 by macro [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> before, and the music
>  >|character with that number happens to be just the pair of parentheses.
>
> Thanks. And now I see why it's so hard to produce "normalsized"
> cautionary accidentals: the parentheses used come in pairs in the
> musix fonts and are either too close together or too far apart for
> a normalsized accidental. I suppose the "separate" left and right
> parentheses in character positions 3 and 4 could be used but that would
> involve significant re-coding.
>
> Bob T.
> _______________________________________________
> TeX-music mailing list
> TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org
> http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>


_______________________________________________
TeX-music mailing list
TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to