>|> >|I use a software called "SharpEye" for scanning and >|translating to >|> MusicXML. >|> >|> SharpEye requires an image as input (rather than reading PDF scores). It >|can >|> generate midi directly, but MusicXML -> PMX >|> -> midi is likely the better choice because SharpEye doesn't >|> provide an editing capabilty to correct the inevitable scanning errors. >|So >|> you'll have to edit the PMX and hope the edited output will be scanned >|> correctly. >|> >|I'm getting older and losing neurons, and maybe that's why I can't see the >|role of scanning after creating a PMX file.
I guess I'm losing neurons too :+). You're right. I was misrembering my experience of trying to use SharpEye to produce midis *before* XML2PMX was available. Bob ------------------------------- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
