How well depleted it really is? Uranium separation is not perfect.
Some radioactivity is still left.
I don't think it is healthy to have it beside You for a long time.
Certainly not 80000 pounds :))
At 05:35 11.3.2010, you wrote:
Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
The gotcha is that you are interested in the amount of heat per
cubic foot rather than the amount of heat per pound. You need to
take the standard heat per weight numbers and convert them to heat
per volume numbers.
Of the things you can easily get, copper is good. Steel is not as
good as copper, but better than aluminum.
Bob
Gold is your friend. Mercury has convective losses because it's a
liquid. Platinum or Osmium would also be ok.
You might want something that is dense but lower conductivity..
lead? Depleted Uranium? (DU is available very cheaply if you can
take 80,000 pound lots)
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4933 (20100310) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
