>> The sawtooth error on the Motorola M12+ is about +/- 25ns, while the >> CW12-TIM has a sawtooth error of +/- 2 ns, so correcting for the >> sawtooth error is not as critical with the CW12-TIM.
> The first claim >> The sawtooth error on the Motorola M12+ is about +/- 25ns > is correct but are you absolutely sure that the second claim is correct > too????? > It would mean a factor >10 improvement of the CW12-TIM against the M12 which > is hardly believeable. The 25 ns probably comes from period of the the free running clock they are using. It doesn't seem unreasonable to me to get 10x better if they use a GPSDO for the local clock so they can get the PPS edge right where they want it. -- These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
