I just posted what I was sent for the manufacturer, warts and all. I did notice they were comparing to the M12+ or M12. I hope the specs are correct. I purchased one and will pass on measurement when I get a chance to test it.
Thomas Knox > To: time-nuts@febo.com > From: hmur...@megapathdsl.net > Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:32:13 -0700 > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] CW12-TIM vs M12M and the world > > > >> The sawtooth error on the Motorola M12+ is about +/- 25ns, while the > >> CW12-TIM has a sawtooth error of +/- 2 ns, so correcting for the > >> sawtooth error is not as critical with the CW12-TIM. > > > The first claim > >> The sawtooth error on the Motorola M12+ is about +/- 25ns > > is correct but are you absolutely sure that the second claim is correct > > too????? > > > It would mean a factor >10 improvement of the CW12-TIM against the M12 which > > is hardly believeable. > > The 25 ns probably comes from period of the the free running clock they are > using. It doesn't seem unreasonable to me to get 10x better if they use a > GPSDO for the local clock so they can get the PPS edge right where they want > it. > > > > -- > These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
