Correction: I should have written "Fisher and Greenberg", (not "Greenfield") in the following passage from my previous message in this thread.
> Nowadays, for > instance, the skeleton of Freud’s theories of psycho-sexual development > are presented, generally in a perfunctory fashion. Often authors do point > out that there is no serious evidence to support much of this stuff, > though many cite supposed corroborations of this or that Freudian notion > by psychoanalytically-based studies, such as those cited in Fisher and > Greenfield’s books – which, incidentally, are generally given far too much > credence by authors of College psychology texts. (See Edward Erwin’s *A > Final Accounting* [MIT Press, 1996] for an extensive critique of such > studies.) Allen Esterson Former lecturer, Science Department Southwark College, London [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
