I would change the doc. Shorter names may be better, and it 'looks' like a URI ( ajp13:localhost:8080 ).
But I'm not very sure, so whatever you fix is ok ( if it's consistent ). Costin On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Hi, > > I have noted the following: > +++ > env->registerFactory( env, "logger.file", jk2_logger_file_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "logger.win32", jk2_logger_win32_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "workerEnv", jk2_workerEnv_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "uriMap", jk2_uriMap_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "uriEnv", jk2_uriEnv_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "endpoint", jk2_endpoint_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "uri", jk2_uriEnv_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "config", jk2_config_file_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "ajp13", jk2_worker_ajp13_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "lb", jk2_worker_lb_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "status", jk2_worker_status_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "run", jk2_worker_run_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "channel.un", jk2_channel_un_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "channel.apr",jk2_channel_apr_socket_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "shm", jk2_shm_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "channel.socket", jk2_channel_socket_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "handler.response", jk2_handler_response_factory > ); env->registerFactory( env, "handler.logon", jk2_handler_logon_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "threadMutex", jk2_mutex_thread_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "procMutex", jk2_mutex_proc_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "channel.jni", jk2_channel_jni_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "worker.jni", jk2_worker_jni_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "vm", jk2_vm_factory ); > env->registerFactory( env, "signal", jk2_signal_factory); > env->registerFactory( env, "user", jk2_user_factory); > +++ > We have worker.jni but ajp13. The actual (short) documentation tells about > worker.ajp13. > Won't it make sense to use worker.* for the workers. > > Comments. I want to know what to change doc or code? ;-) > > Cheers > > Jean-frederic > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
