[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would change the doc. Shorter names may be better, and it 'looks' like a > URI ( ajp13:localhost:8080 ). > > But I'm not very sure, so whatever you fix is ok ( if it's consistent ).
Short names means fixing both doc and code ;-) > > Costin > > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>I have noted the following: >>+++ >> env->registerFactory( env, "logger.file", jk2_logger_file_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "logger.win32", jk2_logger_win32_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "workerEnv", jk2_workerEnv_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "uriMap", jk2_uriMap_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "uriEnv", jk2_uriEnv_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "endpoint", jk2_endpoint_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "uri", jk2_uriEnv_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "config", jk2_config_file_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "ajp13", jk2_worker_ajp13_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "lb", jk2_worker_lb_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "status", jk2_worker_status_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "run", jk2_worker_run_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "channel.un", jk2_channel_un_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "channel.apr",jk2_channel_apr_socket_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "shm", jk2_shm_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "channel.socket", jk2_channel_socket_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "handler.response", jk2_handler_response_factory >>); env->registerFactory( env, "handler.logon", jk2_handler_logon_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "threadMutex", jk2_mutex_thread_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "procMutex", jk2_mutex_proc_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "channel.jni", jk2_channel_jni_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "worker.jni", jk2_worker_jni_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "vm", jk2_vm_factory ); >> env->registerFactory( env, "signal", jk2_signal_factory); >> env->registerFactory( env, "user", jk2_user_factory); >>+++ >>We have worker.jni but ajp13. The actual (short) documentation tells about >>worker.ajp13. >>Won't it make sense to use worker.* for the workers. >> >>Comments. I want to know what to change doc or code? ;-) >> >>Cheers >> >>Jean-frederic >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
