Mark Thomas wrote:
<snip>
The performance comparison between CVS and SVN is in the early stages
and I will post some results once I have a more complete set.
Tests performed on WinXP SP2, with Tortoise CVS 1.8.18 and Tortoise
SVN 1.2.1 using the Watchdog repository. For tests using a single file
I used build.xml.
The results are (averages in seconds):
Operation CVS SVN
checkout 38 51
history 4 5
blame 4 7
diff 4 2
revert 7 1
Also, SVN does not support revision graphs. Some tools can derive the
graph but for the ASF repository this will take hours, possibly days.
See http://subversion.tigris.org/ for a list of other SVN benefits.
I am +1 for moving the remaining Tomcat CVS modules to SVN.
Assuming everyone else is happy to move the remaining tomcat modules
to SVN I would suggest the following stages (Watchdog was stage 1).
I'll give people at least a week to comment on this proposal and
assuming no -1's start the phase 2 towards the end of next week.
2. j-t-service, j-t-site
3. j-servletapi, j-servletapi-4, j-servletapi-5
4. j-tomcat, j-tomcat-4.0
5. j-t-catalina, j-t-5, j-t-jasper, j-t-connectors
Do we need an OK from the spec team before we do stage 3?
Any other comments/concerns?
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
