Adam Buglass wrote:
This is the wrong list but never mind
An alternative is the following:
ResultSet rs; int i = 0; while( rs.next() ) { i++; }
The integer i should be the length of your result set (by the way, don't get confused with RecordSets which are VB - I used to do that all the time!) at the end of the loop - assuming of course that you start from the start of the set, you could use rs.first() to ensure this.
There's tons of useful info on Java methods and classes on suns site: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/api/ http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/
Also look on www.sun.com for good java mailing lists where this kind of question is more specific.
Adam.
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 15:26, Dale, Matt wrote:
This is the wrong list i'm pretty sure but there are a couple of ways to get the number but there isnt a direct method that returns it.
If the result set is scrollable you can iterate through it counting the number of iterations, then set it back to the start when you want to process the records.
The other option (one I prefer) is to load the records into an ArrayList, you can then determine the size quite easily.
If anyone else has any neater solutions i'd like to hear them too as I've had to do this in a few places.
Ta Matt
-----Original Message----- From: soh_mah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 May 2004 15:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Is there any way to check # of Records in RecordSet
Hi
Is there any way to check number of Records in RecordSet?
===== Regards
Sohail Mahmood (416) 636-2553
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A faster aproach if you are using TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE is to call rs.last() then call rs.getRow() I use this all the time and have not had any problems as of yet.
To get back to the beginning is to then call rs.beforeFirst()
then begin using as usual.
Hope that helps.
Wade
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
