From: Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 9:59 AM Subject: NOAA: Blizzard Rearranges Climate Change Announcement
WHEN WILL THE LIES HIT THEM IN THE FACE? http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/02/08/noaa-blizzard-rearranges-climate-ch ange-announcement/ ======================= http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/nov/25/monbiot-clim ate-leak-crisis-response http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703499404574559630382048494.ht ml?mod=googlenews_wsj http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017977/climategate-the- scandal-spreads-the-plot-thickens-the-shame-deepens/ http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936328.ece http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/6679082/Clim ate-change-this-is-the-worst-scientific-scandal-of-our-generation.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6678469/Cli mategate-University-of-East-Anglia-U-turn-in-climate-change-row.html http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8383713.stm http://americac2c.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=2456870%3ABlogPost%3A355961 <http://americac2c.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=2456870%3ABlogPost%3A35596 1&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_post> &xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_post http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100018556/climategate-its- all-unravelling-now/ http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091202/ap_on_re_as/climate_australia http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/57879 http://www.usnews.com/blogs/paper-trail/2009/11/30/penn-state-will-investiga te-climategate.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/01/AR2009120102 737_pf.html http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/143573 http://apnews.myway.com/article/20091206/D9CDQI000.html http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBFB901 <http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBFB901&show_article=1> &show_article=1 1975: The coming Ice Age: http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/03/climate-science-gore-intelligent-technology -sutton.html --------------- http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/69797-gibbs-despite-researc h-dispute-climate-change-is-happening Gibbs: Despite research dispute, 'climate change is happening' (exactly, we have winter, spring, summer and fall idiot) Many of you are too young to remember, but in 1975 our government pushed "the coming ice age." Random House dutifully printed "THE WEATHER CONSPIRACY . coming of the New Ice Age." This may be the only book ever written by 18 authors. All 18 lived just a short sled ride from Washington, D.C. Newsweek fell in line and did a cover issue warning us of global cooling on April 28, 1975. And The New York Times, Aug. 14, 1976, reported "many signs that Earth may be headed for another ice age." OK, you say, that's media. But what did our rational scientists say? In 1974, the National Science Board announced: "During the last 20 to 30 years, world temperature has fallen, ........... http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/03/climate-science-gore-intelligent-technology -sutton.html An "endangerment" finding by the Environmental Protection Agency could pave the way for the government to require businesses that emit carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases to make costly changes in machinery to reduce emissions -- even if Congress doesn't pass pending climate-change legislation. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126013960013179181.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopS tories EPA chief: The hacked e-mails change nothing (in other words, lets don't look at facts)[size=] http://thehill.com//blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/70943-epa-chief-the-hacked-ema ils-dont-change-a-thing <http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/70943-epa-chief-the-hacked-ema ils-dont-change-a-thing> ============================ http://gnosis474.blogspot.com/2009/12/agw-druids-at-copenhagen-know-they-are .html AGW druids at Copenhagen know they are on a losing wicket and <http://gnosis474.blogspot.com/2009/12/agw-druids-at-copenhagen-know-they-ar e.html> it shows Gerald Warner <http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100019180/copenhagen-the-agw -druids-at-copenhagen-know-they-are-on-a-losing-wicket-and-it-shows/> London Telegraph - "... But there is more than that to the irreducible scepticism of the public. Even before dodgy e-mails emerged, the public was realising that this was a scheme, not to save the planet, but to make Al Gore a billionaire. Gore was trying to charge $1,200 a time for people to shake hands and be photographed with him at Copenhagen. Is that the conduct of a man who urgently believes the planet is about to be scorched to a cinder? Is the United Nations a trusted institution? . " .. We MUST act NOW (again)!!!! NOW NOW NOW . http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30774.html Obama: 'Time for talk is over' =============== OK, LETS SET THE STAGE WITH SOME LOGIC HERE .... IN KOPE'N'HAGEN THERE ARE ALL THESE SCEINCENTIST WHO MAJORITIVELY BELIEVE WE ARE EXPERIENCING GLOBAL WARMING .... CHANGED TO CLIMATE CHANGE WHEN THE WEATHER DIDN'T AGREE. AND YOU READ THIS TOO, ..... THEY APPLAUDED THIS CREEP?!!!!!!!!!! SO, WHAT WE HAVE IN HOPE'N'HAGEN IS A BUNCH OF SOCIALIST - COMMUNIST?!!! http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/p utting_our_economy_in_the_hands_of_chavez_fans Putting our economy in the hands of Chavez fans Andrew Bolt Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:34am These maniacs in Copenhagen are voting on your future: President Chavez brought the house down. When he said the process in Copenhagen was "not democratic, it is not inclusive, but isn't that the reality of our world, the world is really and imperial dictatorship.down with imperial dictatorships" he got a rousing round of applause. <http://www.theaustralian.com.au/politics/penny-wong-jeered-hugo-chavez-chee red/story-e6frgczf-1225811179614> When he said there was a "silent and terrible ghost in the room" and that ghost was called capitalism, the applause was deafening. But then he wound up to his grand conclusion - 20 minutes after his 5 minute speaking time was supposed to have ended and after quoting everyone from Karl Marx to Jesus Christ - "our revolution seeks to help all people.socialism, the other ghost that is probably wandering around this room, that's the way to save the planet, capitalism is the road to hell....let's fight against capitalism and make it obey us." He won a standing ovation. UPDATE And at the end of this first clip, Chavez rouses the rabble with more anti-Americanism, too: I don't think Obama is here yet. He got the Nobel Peace Prize almost the same day as he sent 30,000 soldiers to kill innocent people in Afghanistan. How to Manufacture a Climate Consensus Few people understand the real significance of Climategate, the now-famous hacking of emails from the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit (CRU). Most see the contents as demonstrating some arbitrary manipulating of various climate data sources in order to fit preconceived hypotheses (true), or as stonewalling and requesting colleagues to destroy emails to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in the face of potential or actual Freedom of Information requests (also true). http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704398304574598230426037244.ht ml?mod=djemWMPh ================================== The graph shows a rise in average global temperature over the last 100-150 years. The scale of the graph is -.7 degree Celsius up to .7 degree Celsius. It's a regular toaster oven here on ye olde Terra! Now, this is a graph that has been used to hype a religion based on junk science, and there is a serious flaw we all need to understand. The Mainstream Media won't discuss it, the politicians are too stupid to know anything about it, and the communists the world over ignore it in their haste to destroy progress. Here's the dirty little secret: The Earth is 4 billion years old. In geologic time scales, 100 years isn't even the bat of an eyelash. It's certainly not a long enough period of time for us to have gathered enough data to yield statistically significant values for historical averages or the historical standard deviation of temperatures. Let's examine this with the promised illustrations. I've picked an illustration which, unlike the HAD CRU's version of climate change, has easily accessible, original data. This is the graph of the US's economic growth from 1945 to 2005 (source <http://thechartbook.org/images/charts/Economic%20Growth.png> ): This graph shows 60 years worth of economic growth in the US. See all the peaks and valleys? The rises and the falls? The line of best fit (average) is somewhere between 3% and 3.5% growth per year. Now, imagine that Fig. 2 is the graph for the average global temperature, across all 4 billion years that the Earth has been spinning around the sun. But this isn't the graph the man-made global warming communists are showing you. Their graph looks something like this: Based on the graph of 1961's GDP growth, if that was all you knew about the US economy, it would look as though the US had roughly 105% growth, on average. Not even close to the truth, is it? But that's not even right because they're only showing you the 100 years worth of data, out of 4 BILLION years worth of climate. That's .000000025% of the total graph of global temperatures. In reality, giving you the year of 1961 as all of the economic data for the US economic growth over that 60 year period gives too much information compared to the hoax that is man-made global warming. Over 60 years, we have 21,900 days. In each day, there are 1,440 minutes. Thus, in 60 years we have 31,536,000.00 minutes, each one of which would represent .0000000315% of the total time. In other words, 1 minute's worth of economic data would be more information about the US economic growth over that 60-year period than the 100 years worth of climate data gives us about the Earth's historical global temperature. Over that 60-year period of economic activity, for this illustration to hold, we would have to look at roughly 3/4 of a single second's worth of economic data to approach what the man-made global warming crowd is urging you to get upset about. That would be similar to seeing the stock market ticker now, and 3/4 of a second later, seeing it go up less than a single point, and then advocating the complete destruction of the world's economic system. ----------------------------------------- <http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hN_DsbB4lamJzbPiClUwnEX6 IIvw> http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hN_DsbB4lamJzbPiClUwnEX6I Ivw [size= ] <http://bigjournalism.com/pgeller/2010/01/30/obamas-war-on-science-trillions -for-a-hoax-but-not-one-cent-for-nasas-moon-mission/> http://bigjournalism.com/pgeller/2010/01/30/obamas-war-on-science-trillions- for-a-hoax-but-not-one-cent-for-nasas-moon-mission/ [size= ] <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7111525/UN-clima te-change-panel-based-claims-on-student-dissertation-and-magazine-article.ht ml> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7111525/UN-climat e-change-panel-based-claims-on-student-dissertation-and-magazine-article.htm l <http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/02/hacked-climate-emails-fla ws-peer-review> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/02/hacked-climate-emails-flaw s-peer-review India forms new climate change body The Indian government's move is a significant snub to both the IPCC and Dr Pachauri as he battles to defend his reputation following the revelation his most recent climate change report included false claims that most of the Himalayan glaciers would melt away by 2035. Scientists believe it could take more than 300 years for the glaciers to disappear. The body and its chairman have faced growing criticism ever since as questions have been raised on the credibility of their work and the rigour with which climate change claims are assessed. <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7157590/India-fo rms-new-climate-change-body.html> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7157590/India-for ms-new-climate-change-body.html --------- Netherlands adds to UN climate report controversy <http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.8d6e5773c60565dfc6e882b0a8dcbf1 8.4e1&show_article=1> http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.8d6e5773c60565dfc6e882b0a8dcbf18 .4e1&show_article=1 [size=The <http://topics.breitbart.com/the+Netherlands/> Netherlands] has asked the UN climate <http://topics.breitbart.com/Climate+Change/> change panel to explain an inaccurate claim in a landmark 2007 report that more than half the country was below sea level, the Dutch government said Friday. According to the Dutch authorities, only 26 percent of the country is below sea level, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ([size=IPCC] <http://topics.breitbart.com/IPCC/> ) will be asked to account for its figures, environment ministry spokesman [size=Trimo <http://topics.breitbart.com/Trimo+Vallaart/> Vallaart] told [size=AFP.] <http://topics.breitbart.com/AFP/> The incident could cause further embarrassment for the [size=IPCC,] <http://topics.breitbart.com/IPCC/> which recently admitted a claim in the same report that global warming could melt Himalayan glaciers by 2035 was wrong. [size=IPCC] <http://topics.breitbart.com/IPCC/> experts calculated that 55 percent of [size=the <http://topics.breitbart.com/the+Netherlands/> Netherlands] was below sea level by adding the area below sea level -- 26 percent -- to the area threatened by river flooding -- 29 percent -- Vallaart said. "They should have been clearer," Vallaart said, adding that the Dutch office for environmental planning, an [size=IPCC] <http://topics.breitbart.com/IPCC/> partner, had exact figures. Correcting the error had been "on the agenda several times" but had never actually happened, Vallaart said. The spokesman said he regretted the fact that proper procedure was not followed and said it should not be left to politicians to check the [size=IPCC's] <http://topics.breitbart.com/IPCC/> numbers. The Dutch environment ministry will order a review of the report to see if it contains any more errors, Vallaart said. The [size=IPCC's] <http://topics.breitbart.com/IPCC/> 938-page Fourth Assessment Report spurred politicians around the world to vow action with its warning that climate change was on the march, but the body has faced fierce criticism over the glacier mistake. Glaciologists have discredited the Himalaya claim, which is being withdrawn, and the controversy has given fresh ammunition to climate sceptics. No evidence could be found to show the claim had been published in a peer-reviewed journal and reports in Britain have said the reference came from green group the WWF, who in turn sourced it to the New Scientist magazine. *** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email all posts) at <http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr or <http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2> http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2 ; You can also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending an email to <mailto:total_truth_sciences-subscr...@googlegroups.com> total_truth_sciences-subscr...@googlegroups.com ; free book download: <http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> http://www.lulu.com/content/165077 *** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only. *** NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only. To be removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "total_truth_sciences" group. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to total_truth_sciences-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences
