There exists more than 24,000 partial & complete manuscript copies of the bible.
They are available for inspection.
The existing quotes (of portions of the New Testament) of the Bible number over 86,000
These are found in letters and documents of the "church fathers" including several thousand lectionaries (CHURCH SERVICE BOOKS CONTAINING PORTIONS OF SCRIPTURE)
Without the manuscripts all but about 11 verses could be assembled from just the quotations.
All these are available for inspection and cross checking the validity of the new testament we hold in our hands.
Can you provide even ONE sentence from the B O M?
If you can provide one I will eat a beach ball!
In 1947 the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered. They were dated to before Christ and 1000 years earlier than any existing copies. LDS were excited till they found out that the copies of Isaiah 150BC were exactly word for word, as the copy I hold in my hand
2004AD
Portions of Isaiah in the BoM do not even agree with different dated editions of the BoM!
The Dead Sea Scrolls testify against the portions of Isaiah in the BoM.
Over 25,0000 Biblical sites have been discovered over the years
Can you list even ONE Book O Mormon site?
Can you even locate the Continent it occured on?
LDS, care to really take a look at what books have been cooked?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
King James had a large crew of scholars translate the best texts
available. Each member of the crew checked other member's work. A large
number of people who knew those old languages did the best translation
that they could. All of the other translations were produced by scholars
under similar conditions.
Nobody knows language on the moroni plates, if they ever existed
anywhere but in old Joe's mind.
It seems to me that today's bible tranlations have a better claim on
validity than Joe's nebulous claim to having perfectly translated plates
which aren't available for others to examine.
Joe's situation is similar to mohammed's situation; he was the only
one to have access to the revelations brought to him, and nobody else had
any means to check on him to see if his message was correct.
I'll stick with my bible in just about any translation. It's
certainly better than moroni's imaginary plates.
vincent j. fulton
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:07:59 -0700 "Blaine Borrowman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>writes:
Blaine: The story about JS seeing the words cross the stone inside the
hat was never substantiated. At best, I think he may have used the hat
for effect, probably as a joke, and the rock inside was not a crystal
ball--I have a photo of it, and it is opaque, with several holes in it.
When Oliver Cowdery tried to translate, nothing happened. That was
because he had not learned to read the writing by himself. After JS
learned the language of the Nephites, he ceased using the Urim and
Thummim, depending mostly on inspiration to tell him if his own
interpretations were correct.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Deegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Old hebrew Coins found in Kentucky?
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster.
