My what a Broad Brush you have!

--- Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> RE: [Wrightsaid] Digest Number 1245
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Debbie Sawczak 
> To: 'Lance Muir' 
> Sent: March 19, 2006 14:24
> Subject: RE: [Wrightsaid] Digest Number 1245
> 
> 
> I took note of the following: 
> 
> Ian noted from Wrights response to Barnett: 
> >> 
> >> > declare that if the Reformed emphasis on continuity between 
> >> > OT and NT had been dominant in NT scholarship rather than the 
> >> > Lutheran discontinuity view, much of the NPP would have been 
> >> > unnecessary. 
> >> 
> >> I find that an interesting comment. 
> 
> I too find it "an interesting comment", for reasons you've already
> heard me on; i.e., a significant amount of what I hear as new and
> fresh in the evangelical community is very familiar from the Reformed
> part of my background.
> 
> The other message I really appreciated, especially the day after
> watching Good Night and Good Luck, was Ian's below. I noted, without
> having read the book myself, how much of the reaction from Americans
> on the list was negative. It seems that in America, the entire
> left-right spectrum is shifted sharply to the right, so that if you
> are anywhere near the centre, or at all critical of the US, you are a
> Marxist!! How, otherwise, could anyone confuse Wright with a Marxist?
> 
> D 
> 
> Message: 17 
> >   Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 05:50:35 -0000 
> >   From: "Ian Packer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > Subject: Re:  Wright's politics 
> > 
> > Bill S: Having read a lot of Wright's stuff I think it is fair to 
> > call him Marxist... 
> > 
> > Ian P: Nonsense... as a reader of sociology and philosophy, I can 
> > hardly imagine how you make such a connection between Wright and a 
> > materialistic, deterministic, economic apocalypticist. 
> > 
> > -------------------------- 
> > 
> > BS: ... and hard left but that is inevitably a matter of opinion
> and 
> > of semantics. 
> > 
> > IP: Opinion it may be but not 'mere opinion'... one would expect 
> > the 'semantics' to match in some clearer way to how one can 
> > accurately describe the world. But this discussion seems all the 
> > more absurd having just heard Wright talk about the childishness 
> > of 'left' and 'right' talk as though things can be so neatly 
> > characterised as such. (e.g. Archbishop Rowan Williams holds open 
> > the prospect long-term gay relationships as warranting some kind of
> 
> > affirmation of the church but is against abortion. Is he right or 
> > left?) It is this kind of talk which I think is "fundamentally 
> > naive"; as is anyone who imagines that matching troops around the 
> > world is actually what 'we' Christians are about... for goodness 
> > sake, don't we believe we are part of God's transnational people 
> > now... why all the defensiveness over our views (from the
> irrelevant 
> > sidelines) over American, British or Australian policy? Hail, 
> > Caesar... 
> > 
> > If Wright is "in the corner with violently anti American and anti 
> > Jewish political types", then that is a corner so vast that it 
> > hardly deserves to be called a corner (note the highly conflictual 
> > boxing analogy for any disagreement). 
> > 
> > May I suggest that no-one talk about 'their politics' in relation
> to 
> > Wright until they can articulate it from an ecclesiology that takes
> 
> > seriously the corporate nature of Christian faith and our unique 
> > vocation in the world between the horizons of our crucified but 
> > risen Lord and the inaugurated eschatology of peace (shalom). 
> > 
> > Thanks to John S and Rance for sharpening the significant issues
> for 
> > us though, as usual. 
> > 
> > Grace and peace 
> > 
> > Ian 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.5/284 - Release Date:
> 3/17/2006
>   
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to